Was Darwin's Theory On Evolution
A Full Conclusion On Causation?
From: "sudarshan madabushi" <sudarshanm@hotmail.com>
Subject: discussions on Darwin
.
Dear friends,
I couldn't help "overhearing" your interesting
discussions on Darwin so
please forgive me this stray comment from
a "bystander".
.
(1)Darwin's "Origin of Species" is scientific
theory; it is not scientific
law.It is a neat theory dealing centrally
with the evolution of species. It
is not a full theory of causation. Please
check this out with any biologist
if you want to.
.
Vedic inquiry into causation should not
be mistaken to be an inquiry into
the origin and evolution of species. The
two are as different as chalk is
from cheese. There is a big difference between
asking how did "milk turn
into yoghurt overnight?" and asking "What
is a cow? Why,how and wherefore
does it yield milk?".
.
(2) Darwin deals principally with the physical/physiological
evolution of
species. There is very little light shed
in the theory on the nature and
evolution of psychic characteristics of
species.
.
On both counts (1) and (2) above, Darwin's
theory would be inadequate to be
taken as a comprehensive account of Causation,
Evolution and Purpose of
creation. There is no question therefore
of comparing it with the scope of
Vedic inquiry into such matters. The scope
of the Vedas are far, far, larger
and far more sweeping in majesty to be compared
with the specialized and
scientific focus of Charles Darwin.
.
By all means do indulge in comparison of
the two if it gives you
intellectual stimulation. But beware of
confusion if you venture to draw any
valid conclusions from it.
.
Regards,
Sudarshan
.
Further Discussion with our Sri Vaishnava
Cousins:
.
From: "A. Bharat" <kbharat@giasbg01.vsnl.net.in>
Subject: Darwin's theory etc
.
Dear BhAgavatOttamAs
.
In SrI BhAshya Swami EmberumAnAr says quoting
the
ParamAchArya, <yathArtham sarva
vignAnam iti
vedavidAm matam>. All observable
facts and all the
Physical Laws are to be taken as correct.
But it does
not mean that all the "theories" of Scientists
are to
be taken as true. It doesn't happen like
that in the world
of Scientists itself. If A gives out a theory
and B comes out
with its opposite (as happens frequently),
the latter does
not automatically invalidate the former
as one would
logically expect to happen. By an unwritten
Code of
Conduct, both the theories mentioned side
by side and
the reader is allowed to make his own choice.
.
Are such "theories" comparable to the intuitive
"sights" of our
ancient Rshis? Incidentally when the Rshis
reached a
certain point in their meditation they ALL
saw the same
things. One should agree that when even
the most intelligent
scientists draws certain conclusions from
facts he has
observed, and those conclusions pertain
to an area which
is beyond the normal human range,then his
conclusions
remain mere speculations.
.
Darwin happened to observe certain species
in certain islands
and drew certain conclusions. He did not
observe ALL the
species in the entire universe. And even
if he had done
so it would only have given him the actual
position as
it exists today. Any theory he developed
regarding what
could have happened millions of year ago,
is still just
a theory. On the other hand we have the
words of those to whom
the Lord actually showed what really happened
then.We have
His own words in the Gita, we have Sri EmberumAnAr's
(Sri Krishna's)
words in his works. Which of these would
one consider as the
<Apta vAkya> ?
.
As was observed in one of the letters, accepting
Darwin's
theory is tantamount to treating all SRuti-Smriti-PurANa
accounts of creation as myths. As I had
mentioned earlier
these accounts do not consider creation
as occuring in
various time-slots, each slot featuring
only one type of
creature.In the beginning of creation ALL
creatures are
created simultaneously for a very
important reason:
Creation is the only method by which
the soul can reap the fruit of its
past Karma and
also move up or down the scale. In such
a situation if only
fish existed for a million years and then
only birds etc
what will be the fate of the Karma-system
and the statements
of Bhattar <karaNa-kalEbarair
ghatayitum dayamAna-manAh>
etc. Our AchAryas repeat endlessly that
creation is the
means through which the mercy of the Lord
is shown, to
give the bound souls a means to reach Him.
.
Hence I feel Darwin's theory is clearly
contrary to the
ViSishTAdwaita philosophy.
.
SwAmi EmberumAnAr TiruvaDigaLE Saranam!
adiyEn
Bharat
An
Example of Atheism Being Defeated by Theism